Issue: I was initially concerned just with converting people to congregationalism in order to check the perversions of Christianity in the 2nd Great Awakening (I mean, I was the greatest revival preacher). But, the spiritual fervor that resulted from my inspiring revivals bubbled into areas of American life that reached beyond just religion. I caused everybody around me to get involved in various reform movements, just as I became particularly involved in the abolitionist, women’s rights, intemperance, and educational movements. I denounced slavery and alcohol, and championed a system of coeducation of men, women, blacks and whites to advocate for Christian Perfection. I believe in equality of all people, regardless of race or ethnicity.
Solutions: In regards to evoking spiritual fervor within my followers, I am successful because I converted thousands of Americans from newly emerging towns along the Erie Canal, to urban dwellers in such cities and Rochester and New York. The development of the "anxious seat", and public censure of individuals by name in sermons and prayers were successful in furthering religious feelings. In regards to women’s rights, having women pray in public meetings, and learn at Oberlin college is a measure of my success. In regards to educational reform, I became professor and later president of Oberlin College in Ohio (1851-1866) and helped the college in becoming one of the first to co-educate blacks and women with men. In regards to abolitionism, Oberlin College became a center of antislavery agitation and a stop on the Underground Railroad. In regards to intemperance, I condemn alcohol and drunkenness as going against Christian Perfection, and my followers became influential in upholding that view by banding together and forming various groups discouraging drinking. These accomplishments were not always received easily, as many people believed I only incited change by tapping into the emotions of others, and many orthodox clergymen were unsettled by my gaining so many followers in so little time.
Relationship with Others: I would feel comfortable talking with Harriet Tubman, Susan B. Anthony, William Lloyd Garrison, Arthur Tappan, and Theodore Dwight Weld. I would feel uncomfortable talking with John C. Calhoun, and Andrew Jackson.
Hello Charles. I would feel comfortable sitting next to you at the dinner party because you and I are both credited with being leaders in the 2nd Great Awakening. We both caused an enormous religious revival that spread throughout America. I noticed that you were also born in Connecticut, While you were born in Warren, Litchfield County, I was born in New Haven. See you at the dinner party Charles.
ReplyDelete-Lyman Beecher
It would be very nice if I got the chance to sit next to you, Charles. Me and you have both experienced a dramatic conversion and have dedicated our lives to preaching revivals and spreading spiritual fervor at open-air meetings. - Mother Ann Lee.
ReplyDeleteI would be comfortable sitting next to you at the Dinner Party because we both were in favor of abolition and women's rights.
ReplyDelete- Horace Greeley
I would feel uncomfortable sitting next to you because I don't believe in the idea of changing people's religion. I wouldn't be able to have a productive conversation with you because of this ideological difference. I believe in religious toleration, which allows people to choose whatever religion they want and keep that religion.
ReplyDelete